Projecting into the void ...

Getting a handle on this multi-dimensional jigsaw is a fascinating game, not least because words fail to cover the complexities, let alone words from only one language, albeit a rich one, composed of many other languages and already splitting off into variants from other nations ...

Having other languages at hand offers a helpful, broader perspective ... languages with words and sentences, different scripts ... languages made from numbers, mathematics, algebra and so on ... music offering higher level insights, though remembering that words like higher, lower, broader, better, worse, come pre-loaded with meaning ... helpful to tell stories, but not when we fall into the trap of mistaking the word for the thing described ...

Once upon a time, a common device used to alert the reader that a story is to be told, itself frames the story in Time ... a concept with relative reality according to some mystics and scientists ... and hedging bets further, the choice of the word some infers not all, or not all the Time ... which as already suggested, may not be real.

So, it's tricky.

Occam's Razor requires parsimony. .. avoiding flim-flam. .. sufficient information but not too much. E = MC squared for example, perhaps the best known equation in history, was offered by Einstein decades after he intuited the concept, therefore Whole, then broke it up in pieces, filled pages with equations, stripped them to the bone and won the Nobel Prize ... now the C, previously held as constant, let alone squared, turns out to be questioned by discoveries at quantum scale, which obviously left Einstein in a quandary ... denying the new hypotheses of telepathy, suggested by communication faster than the speed of light.

Science moves on. Scientism meanwhile continues to stick with certainties. .. certainly an error if Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle applies. Bohr was honest enough to give up the need to understand the how of the quantum world, leading the Copenhagen School to "shut up and calculate", since probabilities produced sufficient information to change the world ... whilst Bohm soldiered on with others to discover How and Why ... it's said that Science advances death by death, as bright younger minds pick up the baton and carry on ... perhaps to temporary new realities and so ad infinitum.

Silence is also a language. Not of nothing, but everything. Just don't expect to prove it.

Which brings us to the point, finally, of the current theory espoused by Jude Currivan and others, which goes like this, in summary:

This Universe is expanding.
Information is held in two dimensions at the edge, projected into three D reality in the void.
The void is not empty, but full of energy (plus all the projections of the illusory fragments).
Information thus goes two ways. New information returns to the edge and is encoded in 2D.
Times 7 billion souls and growing.
And so on.

The obvious question, what lies beyond the Universe, is skipped as the Cosmic Plenum on the basis that comprehending one is enough for now.

N.B. Please check my scant knowledge of Science for accuracy and let the reader(s) know. Especially if you happen to be Jude Currivan. If only I knew someone who knows her ...